ACLU Will get Money to Research College Discipline in Missouri


The American Civil Liberties Union has obtained a $ 350,000 grant to check how Mississippi schools determine on and supply punishment to college students, resulting from expenses of a disproportionate use of harsher punishments on disabled and minority K-twelve college students.

Punishments like restraint and seclusion, writes Emily Le Coz of The Clarion-Ledger, will get interest by way of a two-yr research funded by the W.K. Kellogg Foundation’s grant. Not only will excessive punishments be studied, but leaders in the training arena will be engaged to help in phasing out these practices in favor of much more positive, effective techniques.

“No little one ought to be topic to abuse, especially at school,” explained Jennifer Riley-Collins, executive director of the ACLU of Mississippi. “Schools are supposed to be a risk-free location conducive to studying, not to torture.”

Young children with disabilities are almost six occasions as likely to to be restrained in school than their able-bodied peers, according to Riley-Collins.  Earlier in this year, the Clarion-Ledger investigated unique training practices and found that at least 30 districts used physical restraint, mechanical restraint, or seclusion – and in some cases all three — to “control” young children with special requirements. During the 2009-2010 school year, the 12 months with the most current available statistics housed with the US Division of Schooling Workplace for Civil Rights, 329 incidents of this sort of punishment have been reported.

Riley-Collins is of the view that this sort of information is often under-reported. In 2011, the Southern Poverty Law Center sued the Jackson Public College District for chaining a teen with ADHD to a pole. There was an additional this kind of incident that same 12 months in the district.

“As several reports have documented, the use of restraint and seclusion can have really significant consequences, such as, most tragically, death,” stated U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan in a letter to college districts urging them to overview their policies on the practices.

“Furthermore,” Duncan explained, “there continues to be no proof that making use of restraint or seclusion is effective in minimizing the occurrence of the dilemma behaviors that frequently precipitate the use of this kind of techniques.”

Though no laws in location in Mississippi regulating the use of seclusion and restraint at college, an attempt to tackle the issue failed earlier this year. The bill would have stopped particular punishments and defined when it was acceptable to use other people, but it died in the Property. Riley-Collins is hopeful it will pass in the 2015 legislative session. She adds that the ACLU of Mississippi will do its component in monitoring and gathering data until finally then.

Mississippi is one of only five states that lack any variety of regulation against the use of these disciplinary practices. Mike McDaniel of WDAM-Tv says that the ACLU will be engaging “civic, community, corporate, and congregational leaders, encourage public awareness, check use of restraint and seclusion in college districts, and advocate for the implementation of optimistic habits interventions and supports that are protected, powerful, and proof-based.”

This is not the 1st time the ACLU has stepped in to spotlight the rights of Mississippi’s children. It has developed several reviews which have exposed severe and negative approaches to classroom behavior that it says have been destructive to students, their families, and teachers.

In a preemptive move against wrongful punishment in Kansas City, the American Civil Liberties Union of Missouri issued a letter to the principal of Lincoln University Preparatory Academy, explaining that punishing students who protested at the college would be unconstitutional, says Dave Helling of The Kansas City Star. Last week during a speech by Gov. Jay Nixon, a group of students rose from their seats and then raised their hands in the air in an apparent protest more than the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri. The college students were not disruptive and left a quick time right after they stood.

Regardless of whether the students left as a part of their protest or have been asked to leave is unclear. The students were informed they would face some type of disciplinary action, which the ACLU finds inappropriate and unconstitutional.

“The Academy need to embrace and applaud its college students for pondering independently and possessing the courage of their convictions,” the letter mentioned. “Standing up to a effective government official in a peaceful, respectful way is a sign of mature and thoughtful participation in civil discourse.”

Concerning the incident, the governor explained he understood the students’ protest, but, in his view, the punishment for the college students need to be left up to the school’s officials.

Leave a Reply