Pakistan assault reveals the truth about terrorism: it kills much more poor Muslims than wealthy westerners

These who suffer most from Islamist extremism are not men and women in rich western nations, but other bad Muslims.

This is the fundamental reality that obliterates the false cloak of righteousness so ostentatiously donned by Islamist jihadists: the very people these misguided males and girls claim to be fighting for, are the ones they destroy in greatest numbers.

Headlines in the western globe seize upon the self-evident reality, borne out by the statistics: terrorism is growing, and more and more individuals are dying from it. But there is a basic deceit to this claim. The devil in the detail lies in who is getting killed.

The city of Sydney – nonetheless the attack in Martin Location is characterised – has been shaken to its core by brutal, senseless assault this week, as London, New York, Madrid, and other individuals have been prior to.

But the Taliban’s attack on a college in Pakistan a day later on, killing at least 141 men and women, 132 of them schoolchildren, is a stark reminder of the outsized value paid by the Muslim globe for vile actions of a misguided number of proclaiming the lead to of their religion.

The worldwide terrorism database maintained by the National Consortium for the Research of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism at the University of Maryland shows a surge in terrorist attacks in latest many years – from around five,000 in 2011 to a lot more than eight,000 in 2012 and almost twelve,000 in 2013 – the 3 biggest many years on record for terrorist attacks.

But, as Bernard Keane analyses here, the raw numbers are not the full story. The number of terror attacks in western countries did rise, and rise substantially, last yr.

In 2012, there have been 140 incidents of terrorism in the west. In 2013, that figure was much more than 250, the enhance driven by a sharp rise in attacks in Northern Ireland and Greece. 12 individuals died.

But people figures are dwarfed by attacks outdoors the west.

In non-western countries, the increase was from eight,000 incidents in 2012 to more than eleven,000 in 2013, the rise driven by continuing sectarian violence in Iraq and Pakistan, and deepening unrest in the Philippines and Egypt.

The amount of non-western terrorism deaths in 2013 was over 22,000.

In November of this year, virtually five,000 individuals died in Islamist fundamentalist terror attacks, the vast majority of these at the hands of Islamic State (Isis) or Boko Haram.

Just in excess of half the dead have been civilians, “the vast bulk … Muslim,” the International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation stated.

The “war on terror” is a device of political rhetoric, not a genuine war. But its victims are true. And, overwhelmingly, it is the world’s Muslims who suffer most. Pakistan has lost a lot more civilians to the “war on terror” than practically any other nation.

In the wake of the Peshawar attack this week, the hardest element for Pakistan now will be to hold its line. The country’s best weapon against the scourge of terrorism is not much more bullets in response, but schooling.

It is women and boys in school.

In Pakistan’s Swat Valley two years in the past, I visited an army-run college known as “Sabaoon”, an Urdu word that broadly translates as “the initial light of dawn”.

It was a college for suicide bombers.

The boys who sat quietly there, in their green-and-white-striped uniforms, had previously been kidnapped or brainwashed by the Taliban. They’d been arrested or rescued from the insurgents’ mountain strongholds. Some had carried weapons into war, some had killed prior to.

1 15-12 months-outdated informed me how he’d been dressed by his militant “brothers” in his heavy explosive vest one winter morning, and carefully informed which wires to touch collectively when he reached the police checkpoint. Then he was driven to the police post, and informed to walk in direction of the men in uniform.

It was only the intervention of a fast-pondering officer, who saw him shaking in worry as he approached, that meant that this boy was alive and in school to inform his story.

I asked the head of the school, a gruff, uniformed key, what the root result in of radicalisation was.

What was the fundamental, underlying cause why these boys could be convinced to kill in the identify of a distorted religious interpretation, to don a vest they knew would destroy them and walk towards a target?

“Poverty,” he said.

“It’s poverty, and that comes from a lack of training.”

Boys in school, he explained, didn’t increase up to become suicide bombers. Younger guys with excellent jobs did not run away to the hills to join the Taliban.

Literate ladies go on to lift complete families from poverty. Females with an training really don’t let their sons to be radicalised.

The cost now may possibly seem as well high, but Pakistan must maintain its young children in college.

That is how the war will be won. And the complete world will advantage.

Leave a Reply