Students Communicate why do humanitarian crises get various levels of assistance?

It has been a testing 12 months for humanitarian emergencies, with conflicts in Syria, Iraq, Palestine, South Sudan and Central African Republic stretching help budgets to the restrict. On best of these manmade emergencies, the Ebola epidemic has demanded a global response, with the UN calling for $ 988m to tackle the outbreak.

Helen Clark, the head of the UN Improvement Programme, summed up the prevailing climate when she said earlier this yr that it was “hard to remember a time when more crises have been jostling for space in the headline news”.

Help for humanitarian disasters is restricted, and inevitably some situations will stay underfunded or even be ignored. The UN has already cautioned that it will be forced to lower food rations for Syrian refugees if it does not acquire more funding, and a similar warning has been sounded about meals help to Afghanistan. Meanwhile, a food crisis in Somalia has left much more than 1 million men and women in need to have of assistance, and there are fears that a plea from the UN Foods and Agriculture Organisation for far more funding is falling on deaf ears.

We want to know your ideas. Why do some humanitarian emergencies receive far more assistance than others? Is a fairer technique for funding allocation attainable? Submit a response of 250 words or fewer and we’ll publish a choice of the best ones. Maintain your response clear and concise, steering clear of development or academic jargon. Email your response to development@theguardian.com with “Students Speak” in the topic line. Please incorporate your title, the nation where you dwell, and the university or school you attend. Submissions shut at 6pm BST on 27 November.

Leave a Reply