Union, College Board Negotiations Manufactured Public in Colorado Vote


The small-observed Proposition 104 in Colorado will alter the way college boards negotiate with teacher unions as the only statewide ballot measure to be accredited by the state’s voters last Tuesday.

A modest quantity of states already require school boards to enable the public to attend meetings. This implies that negotiations on collective bargaining agreements and union contracts will be open for all to see. Only close to a fourth of Colorado districts have collective bargaining agreements, but they are the biggest districts and account for the most public school college students. The move will aid taxpayers in understanding the spending that at times is the better part of a college board’s fiscal budget. The method will grow to be far more transparent.

Proposition 104 will only need that meetings relating to collective bargaining be obtainable to the public. It does not, says Sean Kennedy creating for Collegian Central, give citizens the appropriate to participate in these meetings. The law permits the public a lot more info, not more decision-producing energy. The plus is that the new policy will allow mother and father to grow to be a lot more concerned in their children’s education and the processes that deal with their children’s education.

There is not a clear picture however of how the law will affect how teachers and school districts will negotiate, but Kristen Wyatt of the Linked Press reports that the measure obtained nearly 70% of the vote.

Colorado’s biggest teachers union, the Colorado Education Association (CEA), and the Colorado Association of School Executives have been opposed to the measure. Mike Wetzel, CEA spokesman, mentioned that the language in the law is vague and does not spell out precisely how the measure will perform. Due to the fact Proposition 104 is a law, it is probable that lawmakers will try out to make modifications along the way.

In a story on KUSA-Tv, opponents claimed that bargaining negotiations regarding employment concerns can be sensitive and could be a disadvantage to college boards when they are discussing labor contracts.

“This was an concern of transparency and we feel that secrecy is the enemy of excellent government,” Jon Caldara, president of the Independence Institute, said. “The query is: when individuals see how unions operate, will they far more cozy with the concept of operating without them? I think that is a excellent possibility.”

The Colorado Association of College Boards (CASB) opposed the measure simply because it was not clear, specifically in explaining which meetings can be held in private, according to Ken DeLay, executive director of CASB.

“The sense was that if we can not at least create our bargaining positions privately, that is going to be a real detriment to the district and put the district at a disadvantage in connection to the union,” DeLay stated.

The Independence Institute, a conservative political think tank, supported the proposition.

Kerrie Dallman, president of the CEA, stated that if the authors of Proposition 104 had worked with the schooling local community, the language of the law could have been clarified.

Leave a Reply