University vice-chancellors told: tackle extremism or face contempt fees

University vice-chancellors could be identified in contempt of court if they refuse to apply ministerial directions to tackle extremists on campus, the Uk safety minister, James Brokenshire, has warned.

He also said that school lecturers have been anticipated to report personal students if they had worries about them being drawn into extremism or terrorism.

Brokenshire was providing evidence to peers and MPs on the parliamentary joint human rights committee on the measures in the new counter-terrorism and protection bill now being rapidly-tracked on to the statute guide.

He also confirmed that terror suspects served with a new short-term exclusion buy whilst they were abroad or who are stopped from leaving Britain by the seizure of their passport will not have entry to legal support to allow them to mount a court challenge.

The Property Office minister disclosed that ministers had been actively taking into consideration regardless of whether to make legal aid obtainable to suspects to enable them to mount a judicial review challenge to an exclusion buy even when they are out of the country.

The move in direction of supplying legal support for terror suspects to challenge exclusion orders by means of judicial reviews follows criticism from the official terror laws watchdog, David Anderson QC, who stated his central concern above the electrical power was the absence of any function for the courts in scrutinising its use.

Peers and MPs repeatedly challenged the protection minister above the implications for academic freedom of the proposal in the bill to give ministers the power to direct universities and regional authorities to implement measures to avert men and women from becoming “drawn into terrorism” including denying services to extremist speakers.

The major human rights attorney, Baroness Kennedy of the Shaws, advised Brokenshire that the move was an authoritarian measure that would have a “chilling effect” on universities.

She repeatedly challenged the minister above what sanction would be imposed on universities that refused in the identify of academic freedom to apply a policy that turned them into policemen.

“Will the director of the university be jailed?” she asked. The minister confirmed that university vice-chancellors could, in the last resort, be discovered to be in contempt of court if they refuse to comply. Imprisonment is 1 sanction accessible to a judge to enforce a court order.

Kennedy was supported in voicing powerful concern by Baroness O’Loan, the former Northern Ireland police ombudsman, who described the effect of the requirement as “profoundly significant” on academic freedom.

Brokenshire insisted that the ministerial energy to direct a neighborhood authority or university enforced by a court order would only be employed as a final resort and that several schools already had policies to tackle extremism in area.

He confirmed that guidance was at present being drawn up over exactly how it will operate. Vince Cable, who is the cabinet minister accountable for universities, is also known to have sturdy considerations about the measure.

But Brokenshire confirmed that it was anticipated to be utilized to ensure that extremist speakers have been not offered a platform at universities, saying that some extremist preachers had presently experimented with to use greater training to “spread their twisted messages”.

He also explained academics required to report college students if they had worries they have been turning into withdrawn, reserved or showed “other persona traits”. It was essential to ensure that this kind of individuals have been safeguarded, he mentioned.

Leave a Reply