Ybarra, Jones clash in final debate

IDAHO FALLS – A group of Idaho Falls college students managed to pinpoint some variations amongst Sherri Ybarra and Jana Jones during the ultimate debate of the season Thursday.

Ybarra debate

Sherri Ybarra meets with voters right after Thursday night’s debate in Idaho Falls.

Ybarra, a Mountain House Republican, and Jones, an Idaho Falls Democrat, faced some of the most certain questions of the race courtesy of the Compass Academy English and government students who organized and ran the total debate.

Possibly the biggest big difference exposed Thursday in between the two candidates requires the proposed tiered licensure certification plan that is prior to the State Board of Schooling.

The proposal has drawn fire from hundreds of teachers who attended a series of public meetings about the state this month. Because September, the two candidates have urged state officials handle the proposal cautiously, with Ybarra saying “The problem is complex and we ought to slow down and be certain we get it proper the very first time…”

On Thursday, Ybarra repeated her campaign refrain, calling tiered licensure “a phase in the appropriate path.”

But she went further than she has in other debates by saying tiered licensure will move forward.

“It element is of the governor’s job force recommendations, and we are going to go in that route,” Ybarra stated. “I know the taxpayers and teachers wished this, but the focus is on how to do it.”

Jana Jones debate

Jana Jones met with voters in the course of a meet-amd-greet following Thursday’s debate.

Ybarra mentioned she would support some alterations or tweaks to the strategy, like basing instructor advancement or accountability “on a stage program exactly where you earn points as you stroll up the ladder.”

Meanwhile, Jones continued to assert there are difficulties with the proposal, that “communication broke down” while the plan was developed and that as well a lot of teachers and mother and father are both confused or angered by the proposal.

“If folks really do not comprehend plainly what the suggestions are, we need to quit, slow down, bring everyone back to the table and start off above,” Jones stated.

Thursday’s debate lasted one hour, and looked and felt a little distinct than the many other debates in which Jones and Ybarra clashed.

For starters, there were no rehearsed opening or closing statements. College students asked every candidate the identical ten concerns, and there had been no opportunities for the candidates to rebut every other.

Soon after the debate, both Jones and Ybarra mingled with voters in the school’s lobby.

The campaign occasion was also one of the ideal-attended of the race, with a lot more than 200 people attending.

The candidates have been primarily respectful, but 1 exchange turned lively.

“The way you can verify and see during a campaign if an individual has integrity is how they run the campaign and how they act as a man or woman who is working for workplace,” Jones explained. “That demonstrates to the public what kind of individual you can assume.”

Jones did not identify Ybarra during the exchange, but Ybarra responded immediately saying finger-pointing and accusing an opponent of blunders “is not wonderful.”

“I’m not right here to finger-point,” Ybarra stated. “I’m not right here to be unfavorable. I’m not right here to say ‘look what someone did wrong.’”

Other topics the college students explored during the debate included the schooling budget, Typical Core requirements and testing, leadership characteristics and teacher morale.

The debate was not broadcast live, but Compass Academy students will submit video of the complete debate on their classroom website.

Leave a Reply